1996-12-02 - Re: IP address

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: adamsc@io-online.com
Message Hash: 0c1dee35c2367c771327e6413150c870129b78e9a800018074d2f3c0c0dc07a6
Message ID: <199612021038.EAA02902@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <19961202055418796.AAA68@rn240.io-online.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-02 13:52:30 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 05:52:30 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 05:52:30 -0800 (PST)
To: adamsc@io-online.com
Subject: Re: IP address
In-Reply-To: <19961202055418796.AAA68@rn240.io-online.com>
Message-ID: <199612021038.EAA02902@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Adamsc wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 1 Dec 1996 22:23:30 -0600, Internaut wrote:
> 
> >What is the risk of publishing your dynamic IP address to a web page while you are on line?  How vulnerable is someone just connected to the internet, w/o any server running? What attacks are feasable? --Internaut
> 
> Well, if you are running Win95 (all) or 3.1 (w/certain TCP/IP stacks) your
> machine can be locked up or rebooted at *any* time using just PING!
> 

Isn't is Unix that is actually vulnerable?

	- Igor.

Thread

• Return to December 1996

• Return to “Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)”
• Return to ““Bruce M.” <bkmarsh@feist.com>”
• Return to “ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)”

• Return to “The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>”

• 1996-12-02 (Sun, 1 Dec 1996 21:56:49 -0800 (PST)) - Re: IP address - Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
  • 1996-12-02 (Mon, 2 Dec 1996 05:52:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: IP address - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
    • 1996-12-03 (Mon, 2 Dec 1996 16:58:56 -0800 (PST)) - Re: IP address - “Bruce M.” <bkmarsh@feist.com>
      • 1996-12-03 (Mon, 2 Dec 1996 19:43:02 -0800 (PST)) - Re: IP address - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>