From: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0cff9f10fd55b4a59b1fa0e6a3f60590ac83c57f9b07590e75e9cbfc83713500
Message ID: <v02140b02aee0d06aa8ec@[10.0.2.15]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-20 23:25:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 15:25:29 -0800 (PST)
From: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 15:25:29 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Code+Data separation
Message-ID: <v02140b02aee0d06aa8ec@[10.0.2.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>At 12:08 PM -0800 12/19/96, Peter Hendrickson wrote:
>>Are there any modern processors which keep the code and data separated?
>
A Harvard architecture is a common feature of signal processing chips. A
number of japanese DSP chips (especailly for image processing) in the early
90's used this approach. I believe some earlier models in the TI 34000
series did also. Not sure about the current crop.
-- Steve
Return to December 1996
Return to “azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)”
1996-12-20 (Fri, 20 Dec 1996 15:25:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Code+Data separation - azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)