From: "captain.sarcastic" <kkoller@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 08:55:21 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: no subject (file transmission)
Message-ID: <199612041655.LAA08274@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From cypherpunks-errors@toad.com  Wed Dec  4 11:55:04 1996
Received: from RES2.RESNET.UPENN.EDU (root@RES2.RESNET.UPENN.EDU [130.91.195.242]) by mail2.panix.com (8.7.5/8.7.1/PanixM1.0) with ESMTP id LAA08377 for <kkoller@panix.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:55:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from poboxer.pobox.com (poboxer.pobox.com [207.8.188.2]) by RES2.RESNET.UPENN.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA15261 for <kkoller@RES2.RESNET.UPENN.EDU>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:56:28 -0500
Received: from toad.com (toad.com [140.174.2.1]) by poboxer.pobox.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA29435 for <kkoller@sarcasm.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:54:13 -0500
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA12478 for cypherpunks-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 05:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spain.it.earthlink.net (spain-c.it.earthlink.net [204.119.177.66]) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA12473 for <cypherpunks@toad.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 05:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prosac (Cust62.Max20.Boston.MA.MS.UU.NET [153.35.79.62]) by spain.it.earthlink.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA09364; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 05:12:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <32A579A8.718@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 1996 08:16:24 -0500
From: Stephen Boursy <boursy@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
CC: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Rise and Fall of Cypherpunks WAS [Re: the Dennings] 
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961203233536.10915A-100000@crl11.crl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Precedence: bulk

Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> 
> C'punks,
> 
> On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, Dave Hayes wrote:
>
>> The very existance of the "profane" keeps the "sacred" in
>> existance as well. If you cannot see that, then John Grubor's
>> lesson is wasted on you.
> 
> If this bit of verbal legerdemain makes any sense at all
> (Logos?), then Grubor must be personally responsible for the
> existance of every saint on the Catholic calendar...not.


  Well saints come on go on the Roman Catholic calander--doesn't
mean a hell of a lot.

  Dr. Grubor does an excellent job of bring the vermin out of
the woodwork.

                        Steve