1996-12-31 - Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks

Header Data

From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
To: “Z.B.” <dthorn@gte.net>
Message Hash: 3d46fca59b5f8b3f43ff542116555ad5e194fef3520f215c4997c5d4d8229bf2
Message ID: <v02140b0aaeef4195b36f@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-31 22:23:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 14:23:25 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 14:23:25 -0800 (PST)
To: "Z.B." <dthorn@gte.net>
Subject: Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks
Message-ID: <v02140b0aaeef4195b36f@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 1:01 PM 12/31/1996, Z.B. wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Dec 1996, Dale Thorn wrote:
>> ...I will *not* install and run PGP.

> I agree with Dale here...requiring PGP in order to post would probably
> deter low-level, idiot spammers, but it would also keep those people off
> the list who, for one reason or another, don't like/want/use PGP.

People who don't like using PGP, or can't use it, or won't use it,
do not belong on this list.

> Also, what about people who post to and read the list from someplace other
> than their home computer, like school or work?  I have access to this account
> from my college, but I'm sure not going to leave my keys lying around
> my account just so I can post to a mailing list.

Easy.  Keep a copy of PGP there and a copy of the list public key.
It's okay to leave public keys lying around.

I might add that this is not "just a mailing list."  It is the
Cypherpunks mailing list.  It's worth a little trouble.  If you don't
agree, find a list which is.

Peter Hendrickson
ph@netcom.com







Thread