From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: thad@hammerhead.com (Thaddeus J. Beier)
Message Hash: 45d6c21da451928637a2794d74c390b28e05702882c253be117b0403a022fa1c
Message ID: <3.0.32.19961208203718.00692ac8@netcom14.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-09 04:37:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 20:37:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 20:37:17 -0800 (PST)
To: thad@hammerhead.com (Thaddeus J. Beier)
Subject: Re: PICS is not censorship
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19961208203718.00692ac8@netcom14.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/enriched
At 07:18 PM 12/8/96 -0800, Thaddeus J. Beier wrote:
>I think that most of the PICS labels that are on web pages will be those
>generated by scripts from groups like RSACi. (http://www.rsac.org)
>These groups have contracts that require you to not lie when you fill out their
>questionnaires, and if you do lie, you are in breach of contract and should expect
>to be sued by them.
So what is going to happen if I generate one of their tags from scratch without filling out their questionnaire? Are they going to sue me, claiming that they own an html tag? Can one own an html tag?
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred
Make your mark in the history of mathematics. Use the spare cycles of
your PC/PPC/UNIX box to help find a new prime.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/justforfun/prime.htm
Return to December 1996
Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”
1996-12-09 (Sun, 8 Dec 1996 20:37:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PICS is not censorship - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>