1996-12-14 - Re: Wired Integrity
Header Data
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: nobody@cypherpunks.ca
Message Hash: 50de535a06d9e7a550e575ac3455d50ac08e1f9d4c41fc9953df13ccc34d5cca
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961214005601.12982B-100000@crl7.crl.com>
Reply To: <199612140137.RAA20020@cypherpunks.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-14 09:09:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 01:09:42 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 01:09:42 -0800 (PST)
To: nobody@cypherpunks.ca
Subject: Re: Wired Integrity
In-Reply-To: <199612140137.RAA20020@cypherpunks.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961214005601.12982B-100000@crl7.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Fri, 13 Dec 1996 nobody@cypherpunks.ca wrote:
> Wired should have appended a short paragraph explaining the
> possible conflict of interest.
I agree. It was an editorial decision, of course, but I think
it would have been the best course of action.
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thread
Return to December 1996
- Return to “nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald, a remailer node)”
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”
- 1996-12-14 (Fri, 13 Dec 1996 17:52:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Wired Integrity - nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald, a remailer node)
- 1996-12-14 (Sat, 14 Dec 1996 01:09:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Wired Integrity - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>