From: "Matthew J. Miszewski" <mjmiski@execpc.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 20:39:04 -0800 (PST)
To: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Subject: Re: Redlining
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19961211223821.006a1fe4@execpc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


(snip)
>I have no trouble believing that the student loan market would quickly
>dry up were the government to get out of the business.

Just wanted to clear up that my reference to student loans was not meant to
start a discussion of the granting of _those_ loans.  It was meant to spark
a discussion of the lending to those borrowers *after* they graduate.  As a
group, their default rate is generally high.  And yet, as a group, the
extension of credit to these people is not systematically denied (as in
redlining).

I take responsibility for the thread being confused as I believe my first
mention of it was unclear.  mea culpa.  

>
>Red Rackham
>

Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMq+MOLpijqL8wiT1AQFASQQAmyDZh6duHqn2EOMu6vHG4EH7YFOLC/3c
UX7WQTeFTJRdstsdot8kbooCpKq6N23m06dBjiiswAs7rLLEypywfKzC1miS5FO0
4sEh0za3Eh7QuGKZJICosl28Y2n6m8XLV8GYMVwRWdWvWMa+/xdtfHZtdji80V75
utym7+FTApY=
=/gNF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----