1996-12-05 - Re: PRIVACY: X-No-Archive and mail.cypherpunks
Header Data
From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: rcgraves@ix.netcom.com (Rich Graves)
Message Hash: 586fdf5ed77a68a766e52694c689eb7f4890debfe76c2fb957cdcc444a3832fd
Message ID: <199612050317.VAA18674@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <32A5DC5B.3411@ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-05 03:24:45 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 19:24:45 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 19:24:45 -0800 (PST)
To: rcgraves@ix.netcom.com (Rich Graves)
Subject: Re: PRIVACY: X-No-Archive and mail.cypherpunks
In-Reply-To: <32A5DC5B.3411@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199612050317.VAA18674@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
X-No-Archive: yes
Rich Graves wrote:
>
> FYI, the search engines that honor an X-No-Archive header also tend to
> skip posts with X-No-Archive: yes as the first line of the body of the
> message.
But it is so simple to modify the reposting program...
> IMO this is preferable anyway, because it lets your readers know what
> you're doing.
To me, it is easier to define X-No-Archive: yes once and for all.
- Igor.
Thread
Return to December 1996
- Return to “ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)”
- Return to “Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>”
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”
- 1996-12-03 (Tue, 3 Dec 1996 08:17:42 -0800 (PST)) - PRIVACY: X-No-Archive and mail.cypherpunks - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
- 1996-12-03 (Tue, 3 Dec 1996 10:19:07 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PRIVACY: X-No-Archive and mail.cypherpunks - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
- 1996-12-04 (Wed, 4 Dec 1996 12:18:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PRIVACY: X-No-Archive and mail.cypherpunks - Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com>
- 1996-12-05 (Wed, 4 Dec 1996 19:24:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PRIVACY: X-No-Archive and mail.cypherpunks - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)