From: drose@AZStarNet.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 594abb4c027e73a75c0123bbe99af99d26d721791af79c704d39ee321175c70f
Message ID: <199612220126.SAA20072@web.azstarnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-22 01:26:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 17:26:46 -0800 (PST)
From: drose@AZStarNet.com
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 17:26:46 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Ebonics
Message-ID: <199612220126.SAA20072@web.azstarnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Matthew J. Miszewski writes:
>Why is it that personal freedom, sometimes expressed by choice of dialect
>or language, seemingly has such arbitrary limits? Many on the list
>complain that they are subject to too many rules, and yet, seem to chime in
>on multi-linugual issues in this way.
Mr. Miszewski:
As an attorney, you may be acquainted with the concept of "reasonableness."
I can certainly express my personal freedom by passing wind at home (subject
only to the possibly vociferous objections of my family).
Were I to fart in church or in a board meeting, that would be a horse of a
different color, nicht wahr?
Return to December 1996
Return to “drose@AZStarNet.com”