From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Message Hash: 5b2572b3b9cd17a2c92a8484dadb42183010025eb7492251235038f03236029d
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961204154447.29195C-100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <199612042041.MAA19687@kachina.jetcafe.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-04 23:55:58 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:55:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:55:58 -0800 (PST)
To: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Subject: Re: The Rise and Fall of Cypherpunks WAS [Re: the Dennings]
In-Reply-To: <199612042041.MAA19687@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961204154447.29195C-100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Dave Hayes wrote:
> Why didn't you be honest and just say "I don't understand this,
> please explain"?
Dave is assuming facts not in evidence. His meaning was
transparently obvious. My comment was merely the /reducto ad
absurdum/ of his statement. Dave's "insight" is not profound,
merely shallow and specious. Sort of like "Deep Thoughts" on
Saturday Night Live--"Without night, there can be no day."
(Whoa man, that's SO heavy!)
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Return to December 1996
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”