From: um@c2.net (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
To: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Message Hash: 65ade7bf87d1f6454e6180c2dfff977d4ea3dbdb8f0f272312d1c45ec86fab21
Message ID: <m0vVRHN-0003bkC@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Reply To: <199612040350.WAA08153@beast.brainlink.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-05 01:34:07 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:34:07 -0800 (PST)
From: um@c2.net (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:34:07 -0800 (PST)
To: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Subject: Re: Strong-crypto smart cards in Singapore and Germany
In-Reply-To: <199612040350.WAA08153@beast.brainlink.com>
Message-ID: <m0vVRHN-0003bkC@ulf.mali.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Peter Gutmann writes:
>The standardisation committee of the German banks have also produced
>an electronic wallet which should have 25 million (yes, 25M) users by
>January of next year. Again, this is a pure electronic wallet, with
>2-key triple DES and 768-bit (to become 1024-bit) RSA encryption.
>[...] This looks like a very nice system, and unlike Mondex doesn't
>rely entirely on the hope that criminals can't get at the data on the
>card.
For 'security reasons', all transactions are logged in what is called
'shadow accounts'. Not what I would call a very nice system.
Return to December 1996
Return to “um@c2.net (Ulf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)”
Unknown thread root