1996-12-20 - Re: Executing Encrypted Code

Header Data

From: AwakenToMe@aol.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6cb5692ef49e49101d2180289c865478a76d8a1ee6c5d071f9ba77ffde69e62d
Message ID: <961220133919169266741@emout13.mail.aol.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1996-12-20 19:36:13 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:36:13 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: AwakenToMe@aol.com
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:36:13 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Executing Encrypted Code
Message-ID: <961220133919_169266741@emout13.mail.aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

In a message dated 96-12-20 03:30:46 EST, you write:

<< > >You could also timestamp the software so that it only runs for a given
 > >length of time.  This will encourage people to upgrade regularly.  ;-)
 > >>
If anyone thinks it is anything but trivial to track down a call for
time/date and a comparison of the two.. and then overwrite the area with some
nop's to make sure the address jumps come out the same.. your sadly mistaken