1996-12-06 - re: Gilmore / Logos

Header Data

From: nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6fea9c59c9fc0ed03c2aa96c95f7a24bea7fabbb120e81964e2ff08967fe28a2
Message ID: <199612061833.KAA16864@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-06 18:44:42 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 10:44:42 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald)
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 10:44:42 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: Gilmore / Logos
Message-ID: <199612061833.KAA16864@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Heh.
Think again. Logos is obviously someone who has a lot of
time on his/her hands. Consider the volume of Gilmore over
the last several months compared to the volume of Logos
over the last several days. Gilmore has quite a bit more
on his mind than how people behave on CP. Logos' identity
is clearly not Gilmore. I doubt Gilmore even reads CP
anymore.

So who _is_ Logos. We know that Logos:

1)Tim May suspects who Logos is
2)Is a prolific poster
3)Intends to combat DLV/DT and other Detweilers

The oddest tidbit yet is Tim May's posting to the *list* 
"P.S. I certainly hope this "Logos" nym is not who 
I suspect it is, as this will surely end our Real World 
friendship. A fucking bozo."

This post clearly is an act of misdirection. If May had a 
personal bone to pick with someone he actually knows
than what purpose does it serve to announce this to the 
list? Nothing less than to preempt the obvious assertation
that Logos is Tim May.

W.W. Brierson







Thread