From: blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 731ee4cac37ab307037093768cda832cb5ccdfb7aac3ede33acc08486a0bdf7b
Message ID: <01BBE23E.19BA2560@king1-01.cnw.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-05 07:51:30 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 23:51:30 -0800 (PST)
From: blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 23:51:30 -0800 (PST)
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Counterproductive Dorothy Denning Flames
Message-ID: <01BBE23E.19BA2560@king1-01.cnw.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Sir Galahad
I agree. I hope that my own statements have influence in spite of
my mouldy reputation.
...........................................
Well, on the net nobody knows if you're mouldy, but only if your ideas are
fresh. :>)
You've presented some quite insightful explanations for why Ms. Denning's
prestigious image would give one pause to consider her with reprehension,
if not outright contempt. As they say, YMMV, depending on how educated you
are on the subject of encryption, privacy, and crimes against humanity.
..
Blanc
Return to December 1996
Return to “blanc <blancw@cnw.com>”
1996-12-05 (Wed, 4 Dec 1996 23:51:30 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Counterproductive Dorothy Denning Flames - blanc <blancw@cnw.com>