1996-12-10 - Re: PICS is not censorship

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7f8ed50ab895fb761f765a9fb6b3479f9dacf43cd8546d91d5acb56418952f04
Message ID: <P7oqyD112w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <32AD8E70.41C6@hammerhead.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-10 21:51:23 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:51:23 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:51:23 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PICS is not censorship
In-Reply-To: <32AD8E70.41C6@hammerhead.com>
Message-ID: <P7oqyD112w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


"Thaddeus J. Beier" <thad@hammerhead.com> writes:

> Timothy C. May wrote:
>
> > If it's only a contract, and forever only a contract, then I am less
> > worried. But my point is that I fear the purely contractual status will not
> > last.

Timmy May is a disgusting low-life - a true human garbage slimeball.

> I completely agree, if the labels, and their format, are mandated, then
> it is
> a bad thing.

Most WWW browsers won't understand your HTML if you choose not to use
the <HTML>, <BODY>, <HEAD>, etc tags.  If you think that's censorship,
you should write your own browser. :-)

(Just trying to replicate the "logic" of Gilmore defenders here.)

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread