From: “Robin Whittle” <firstpr@ozemail.com.au>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 94645e6c11d5ef09d015e3d09f27b0679f71879d4d2cecb038b1493f5f5319db
Message ID: <199612071722.EAA27014@oznet02.ozemail.com.au>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-07 17:22:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 09:22:47 -0800 (PST)
From: "Robin Whittle" <firstpr@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 09:22:47 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: OECD policy: constructive comments?
Message-ID: <199612071722.EAA27014@oznet02.ozemail.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
The US, French and UK government policies on crypto control are
stupid.
The OECD has a group of so-called experts who are likely to reach the
same conclusion about how governements "must" have access to the
content of criminal communications.
For a commented version of a leaked draft the OECD crypto guidelines,
see my WWW site. Recently I got some email from someone at the OECD
who is on the secretariat working on this. The didn't seem to mind
me publishing the draft and they seemed to appreciate my comments.
These people seem to be in their own government circle - but if you
can get through to them, at least some of them will listen. They are
likely to be intelligent, concerned people, but due to their lack of
wide perspective (something they really should be working harder on,
for sure) they may come up with some totally unrealistic policies.
In fact, most of the draft seems to be really good - it is only the
last bit on law-enforcement access which is crook and this seems to
be at odds with the rest of the draft.
It is no good complaining about them sitting in their bunker if we
won't crawl out of ours. If you have some constructive comments on
the draft, let me know and I will put you in touch with the OECD
secretariat.
- Robin
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 08:00:32 -0500
> From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Encryption policy challenged
> http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,5909,00.html?dtn.head
>
> "The Business Software Alliance, a powerful Washington trade
> organization, warned the White House that its encryption policy will
> fail if the government does not turn to the industry for guidance."
>
> blah blah blah ...
>
> Interesting how these polite requests from the SBA, et al, are going
> for such ridiculously low goals. Being able to export 56-bit symmetric
> cipher products... Why in the world go for such a low number when that
> is the absolute *best* that you can possibly get? And with such a
> small difference between 56 and 40 bits, there isn't really any room
> to haggle.
>
> Duh.
>
> --
> Matt Curtin cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com Megasoft, Inc Chief Scientist
> http://www.research.megasoft.com/people/cmcurtin/ I speak only for myself.
> Hacker Security Firewall Crypto PGP Privacy Unix Perl Java Internet Intranet
. Robin Whittle .
. http://www.ozemail.com.au/~firstpr firstpr@ozemail.com.au .
. 11 Miller St. Heidelberg Heights 3081 Melbourne Australia .
. Ph +61-3-9459-2889 Fax +61-3-9458-1736 .
. Consumer advocacy in telecommunications, especially privacy .
. .
. First Principles - Research and expression - music, .
. music industry, telecommunications .
. human factors in technology adoption.
. .
. Real World Interfaces - Hardware and software, especially .
. for music .
Return to December 1996
Return to ““Robin Whittle” <firstpr@ozemail.com.au>”
1996-12-07 (Sat, 7 Dec 1996 09:22:47 -0800 (PST)) - OECD policy: constructive comments? - “Robin Whittle” <firstpr@ozemail.com.au>