1996-12-04 - No Subject

Header Data

From: logos <logos@c2.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9c34d9bb077b8e8dfb355811c551df05417cea8513a104eb89e56174d783cb4c
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961204070229.25120B-100000@blacklodge.c2.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-04 15:16:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 07:16:04 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: logos <logos@c2.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 07:16:04 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961204070229.25120B-100000@blacklodge.c2.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Dimitri Vulis wrote:

> Lame losers who call themselves "cypher punks" and bend
> over for John Gilmore.

     It is obvious that you, Dimitri Vulis, intend to be
disruptive to the operation of this list. I have politely
asked you several specific questions about your motives.

     I am politely asking you again, Dimitri Vulis, why are
you unwilling to rationally and politely discuss whatever
grievances you have with specific Cypherpunks? I believe
you are capable of rational discourse, you allegedly have
some academic credentials so you must have a passing
familiarity with formal debate. Why are you unwilling to
join this discussion with anything other than immature
insults? If the facts are on your side, a reasonable 
demeanor can only enhance your arguments. If the facts
are not on your side, why can you not graciously admit you
are wrong and withdraw your accusations.

     I have been unfailingly polite to you. Do you have it
within your character to respond to me in kind?

     Thank you for your attentions to this matter.

Logos out