1996-12-26 - Re: WHICH

Header Data

From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
To: listproc@plaidworks.com
Message Hash: a2042c48b97f9dde46fc01950c8b4f3d39041bfb2f33eb5758da99fa73a0c7d5
Message ID: <199612261949.LAA07264@slack.lne.com>
Reply To: <199612261909.LAA27991@plaidworks.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-26 19:50:28 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 11:50:28 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 11:50:28 -0800 (PST)
To: listproc@plaidworks.com
Subject: Re: WHICH
In-Reply-To: <199612261909.LAA27991@plaidworks.com>
Message-ID: <199612261949.LAA07264@slack.lne.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


listproc@plaidworks.com writes:
> 
> cypherpunks@toad.com: You are subscribed to the following lists;
> if none appear, you are not subscribed to any:
> MINORS
> MINORS-SCORES
> IHL
> BAY-AREA-HOCKEY
> ROLLER-HOCKEY-INTL
> WOMEN-IN-HOCKEY
> GIANTS
> GIANTS-TICKETS
> BASEBALL-CHAT
> SHARKS
> SHARKS-TICKETS
> SHARKS-CHAT
> HOCKEY-CHAT
> DALLAS-STARS
> LA-KINGS
> ONLINE-DRIVE
> PIT-PENGUINS
> MAPLE-LEAFS
> OTT-SENATORS
> PHX-COYOTES
> BHAWKS-L
> COL-AVALANCHE
> HOCKEY-COACHES
> HOCKEY-REFEREES
> CAL-FLAMES
> OAK-ATHLETICS
> HOCKEY-PLAYERS


I've submitted a request to unsubscribe cypherpunks from these lists.
I have also notified the operator of plaidworks.com of the problem.

While I think that his web-based list-subscription tools is neat, it's
obvious that the potential for abuse is large.  What solutions are there
for protecting us from assholes like the one who signed cypherpunks
up to all these lists?

Maybe soon all lists will require some form of digital ID from new
subscribers?

-- 
Eric Murray  ericm@lne.com  ericm@motorcycle.com  http://www.lne.com/ericm
PGP keyid:E03F65E5 fingerprint:50 B0 A2 4C 7D 86 FC 03  92 E8 AC E6 7E 27 29 AF





Thread