1996-12-21 - Re: Proof that “cypher punks” have complete degenerated…

Header Data

From: geeman@best.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a660895ee691bf5d3c251c8176acc2aaa760b0e204000b6b74206e399d892b8b
Message ID: <3.0.32.19961220092344.0068c554@best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-21 16:54:30 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 08:54:30 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: geeman@best.com
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 08:54:30 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Proof that "cypher punks" have complete degenerated...
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19961220092344.0068c554@best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 09:08 AM 12/19/96 -0800, you wrote:
>geeman@best.com wrote:
>> It wasn't worth commenting on.
>> Appending data after the ctrl-Z as stego?
>> Not even worth a letter to the ed!
>
>> Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>> > No one even commented on the latest Dr. Dobbs issue.
>
>After seeing the initial post, I ran out to get a copy, but they were
>all gone.  I find it hard to believe that appending data to a file is
>considered stego, even by a commercial publication such as Dr. Dobb's.
>Can anyone confirm this?
>

Well, there it is, indeed.  I couldn't friggin believe it, since I've
written for them and usually the stuff's pretty good.  A program to 
append data after a text file's ctrl-Z EOF byte.  If you _really_
want it secure, crypt it with the compiler's PRNG.  ;)







Thread