1996-12-09 - Re: PICS is not censorship

Header Data

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: aa69c46f19b06a89c74f1c6aa4a8aeeb11d84f4706d69f92ea40b2f72ad08759
Message ID: <3.0.32.19961208235541.006c69d4@mail.io.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-09 08:11:56 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:11:56 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:11:56 -0800 (PST)
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: PICS is not censorship
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19961208235541.006c69d4@mail.io.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 08:37 PM 12/8/96 -0800, Lucky Green wrote:
>>>> 
At 07:18 PM 12/8/96 -0800, Thaddeus J. Beier wrote:
>I think that most of the PICS labels that are on web pages will be those
>generated by scripts from groups like RSACi. (http://www.rsac.org)
>These groups have contracts that require you to not lie when you fill out
their
>questionnaires, and if you do lie, you are in breach of contract and
should expect
>to be sued by them.

So what is going to happen if I generate one of their tags from scratch
without filling out their questionnaire? Are they going to sue me, claiming
that they own an html tag? Can one own an html tag?

"Owning" an html tag is oversimplifying things; but claiming that you've
been rated a certain way by a certain group (if you haven't) could
potentially create fraud, trademark, and (maybe) copyright problems - an
easy analogy is to the "UL" and "Good Housekeeping" symbols displayed on
some consumer goods.

--
Greg Broiles                | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell:
gbroiles@netbox.com         | 
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto.
                            | 





Thread