From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ad9bdbbac008798dda3780a2c288b34f1674e776ee3ee1e07430e3d39bc54ccd
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19961218221529.0068a48c@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-18 22:19:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: More on Van Eck
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19961218221529.0068a48c@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Steve Schear has provided a 1988 follow-up article on
Van Eck's 1985 study of EMR snooping. It includes
a letter by Van Eck explaining why he omitted certain
information in the original article, and why his employer
"classified" more sophisticated studies of "compromising
emanation."
We've put up HTML and PDF versions:
http://jya.com/bits.htm (12 kb plus 2 images)
http://jya.com/bits.pdf (85 kb)
Return to December 1996
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1996-12-18 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)) - More on Van Eck - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>