From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “ichudov@algebra.com>
Message Hash: af19be7412c905a32e51ae48eb01cfa0928f5c409bdd7bad7d962b2ad95bec77
Message ID: <19961205065535453.AAA200@rn215.io-online.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-05 06:58:20 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:58:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:58:20 -0800 (PST)
To: "ichudov@algebra.com>
Subject: Re: IP address
Message-ID: <19961205065535453.AAA200@rn215.io-online.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 2 Dec 1996 04:38:46 -0600 (CST), Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
>> >What is the risk of publishing your dynamic IP address to a web page while you are on line? How vulnerable is >> >someone just connected to the internet, w/o any server running? What attacks are feasable? --Internaut
>> Well, if you are running Win95 (all) or 3.1 (w/certain TCP/IP stacks) your
>> machine can be locked up or rebooted at *any* time using just PING!
>Isn't is Unix that is actually vulnerable?
Actually, it anything from Windows systems to Unix boxes to routers to
printers to firewalls, etc can be vulnerable..!
I know that linux got a patch out in 2 hours 35 minutes 10 seconds and that
OS/2 hasn't been vulnerable since 1990 or so, but that's just because I use
those systems. Check http://www.sophist.demon.co.uk/ping/ for details on
your system.
# Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
# <cadams@acucobol.com> | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
--- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)
Return to December 1996
Return to “Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)”
1996-12-05 (Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:58:20 -0800 (PST)) - Re: IP address - Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)