From: AwakenToMe@aol.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b392ec1ecb12b3c6bb7a33c2910326c1c15e91d56ec495f16768742845fdffbc
Message ID: <9612302239021156080622@emout14.mail.aol.com>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-31 03:39:49 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 19:39:49 -0800 (PST)
From: AwakenToMe@aol.com
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 19:39:49 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: With my deepest regards....
Message-ID: <961230223902_1156080622@emout14.mail.aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In a message dated 96-12-30 17:46:12 EST, you write:
<< AwakenToMe@aol.com wrote:
> Adam Breaux wrote:
> > I am withdrawing from this list. Not because of the volume of
> > email...that I can deal with...but what I cannot deal with is the
> > volume of garbage and egotistical ranting[snippo]
> Note to cypherpunks: This guy complains about the problem, but he *is*
> the problem. *He* wants to tell us *he's* leaving. Talk about ego-
> tistical ranting! What a hypocrite.
> Since I never said I dont contribute to the problem.. I think Ill point
> out... that in a reverse notion...He isn't the problem. What you replied
> back is the problem.
Argumentum ad nauseam. The point is, Adam (I think) wanted to tell us
he's leaving. Well, who gives a shit, anyway? Instead of ranting
against me, tell the cypherpunks why they should care that this
particular individual is "leaving the list". >>
he did: =-}
<<I am withdrawing from this list. Not because of the volume of
email...that I can deal with...but what I cannot deal with is the
volume of garbage and egotistical ranting that seems so prevalent in
what should for all sakes and purposes be a discussion of cyphering
and security. Apparently the name of this list is designed to
mislead...because of all the posts, a grand total of 5% proved worth
reading at all.>>
Return to December 1996
Return to “AwakenToMe@aol.com”
1996-12-31 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 19:39:49 -0800 (PST)) - Re: With my deepest regards…. - AwakenToMe@aol.com