1996-12-08 - Re: PICS is not censorship

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bacd92595b363caf258df0c89338d5ff30ec8fd4efa3df45e875968d9a5ae29b
Message ID: <3.0.32.19961208154000.006adf40@netcom14.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-08 23:51:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 15:51:42 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 15:51:42 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PICS is not censorship
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19961208154000.006adf40@netcom14.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 09:15 PM 12/7/96 -0800, Thaddeus J. Beier wrote:
>I don't think that PICS will be mandated any more than those two standards
>are mandated, perhaps I'm naive, but I think that the social conventions
>will work in this case.

Let's put the question if something like PICS will be mandated aside for
the moment. Do you agree that sites that deliberately mislabel their
content, will eventually face legal action? If so, then PICS should not be
considered truly voluntary.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred
   Make your mark in the history of mathematics. Use the spare cycles of
   your PC/PPC/UNIX box to help find a new prime.
   http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/justforfun/prime.htm





Thread