From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
To: Hal Finney <hal@rain.org>
Message Hash: bd674b9b45f4721c67e795bd08d0364bac2b3258e055094ef2ca692dd0f03bbc
Message ID: <9612202119.AA00892@ch1d157nwk>
Reply To: <199612201543.HAA02076@crypt.hfinney.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-20 21:19:32 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 13:19:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 13:19:32 -0800 (PST)
To: Hal Finney <hal@rain.org>
Subject: Re: Executing Encrypted Code
In-Reply-To: <199612201543.HAA02076@crypt.hfinney.com>
Message-ID: <9612202119.AA00892@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hal Finney writes:
> The answer presumably is that the software manufacturer will
> sell software with such limits for much less than he will sell
> unlimited software. That's because software piracy is such
> a major problem, and this way he can be protected against
> piracy from this copy of his program. So people with these
> CPU's can buy their software a lot cheaper.
I believe this is a pipedream. As it stands now, virtually all of the
software that requires special hardware dongles is ridiculously expensive,
even compared to similar offerings from other companies.
andrew
Return to December 1996
Return to “Hal Finney <hal@rain.org>”