1996-12-07 - Re: Gilmore / Logos

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: “Butler, Scott” <SButler@chemson.com>
Message Hash: c8a3778343bf6374802ae4641729bd66beb7ca0b1f126e70fa8460de5d51a7cf
Message ID: <32A8EF3E.3249@gte.net>
Reply To: <c=GB%a=_%p=CHEMSON%l=CSH_NT0-961206155349Z-920@csa-ntx.chemson.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-07 04:18:32 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 20:18:32 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 20:18:32 -0800 (PST)
To: "Butler, Scott" <SButler@chemson.com>
Subject: Re: Gilmore / Logos
In-Reply-To: <c=GB%a=_%p=CHEMSON%l=CSH_NT0-961206155349Z-920@csa-ntx.chemson.com>
Message-ID: <32A8EF3E.3249@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Butler, Scott wrote:
> Sorry for the spam,
> but does anyone know if it is true that John Gilmore and this Logos
> character are the same person ?
> Before you dismiss the idea, just think about it for a minute.

Seriously, it's very doubtful.  The Logos character is too lame to be
Gilmore.  Remember the Star Trek, Trouble With Tribbles, where the
Klingon says "...but Kirk, he's not soft.  He may be a swaggering,...",
and so on.  Whatever Gilmore is, I hope to God it's not Logos, or we're
in big trouble.