From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 11:31:08 -0800 (PST)
To: Peter Hendrickson <ph@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks
In-Reply-To: <v02140b01aeef08c759b8@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961231111537.9271B-100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Tue, 31 Dec 1996, Peter Hendrickson wrote:

> At 7:04 AM 12/31/1996, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> > There is a simple solution to keeping anonymous posters anonymous
> > under this or any similar scheme.  Volunteers could act as
> > "gateways" for anonymous posts.  Self-selected list members could
> > announce that they would forward anonymous posts using one of
> > their own tokens for the purpose.  (In the alternative, the
> > gateway volunteers could be given extra tokens solely for that
> > purpose.)
> 
> Would this expose the posters to liability?  Unlike an anonymous
> remailer, they are deciding what to post.

Probably yes.  This is where the gateway volunteer's discretion
would come into play. 


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~