1996-12-13 - Re: KRA_gak

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Message Hash: ced5e32d8208d59cebe3a7c24776b47227057d7c3d58e032e8f24d395b678e65
Message ID: <199612131510.KAA27361@homeport.org>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19961213125042.00690070@pop.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-13 18:15:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:15:21 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:15:21 -0800 (PST)
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Subject: Re: KRA_gak
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19961213125042.00690070@pop.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <199612131510.KAA27361@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


John Young wrote:
|  The key recovery alliance has more than tripled its membership 
|  and identified its charter objectives.

|  + promoting interoperability between different key recovery and 
|  non-key recovery solutions 

	Isn't this in direct conflict with one of NIST's criteria?

|  + defining a commercial infrastructure for worldwide development 
|  of strong encryption 
| 
|  + maximizing security for business

	Isn't this in direct conflict with the FBI's criteria? ;)

|  To facilitate meeting these and other objectives, the alliance
|  identified a series of working committees targeted to meet within
|  the next 60 days. Soon after this 60-day period, the now
|  40-member alliance will re-convene to mark the progress of these
|  committees and to identify future benchmarks and deliverables.

	Did they identify the committees, or announce that they will
exist?

Adam


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread