From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Message Hash: ced5e32d8208d59cebe3a7c24776b47227057d7c3d58e032e8f24d395b678e65
Message ID: <199612131510.KAA27361@homeport.org>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19961213125042.00690070@pop.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-13 18:15:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:15:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:15:21 -0800 (PST)
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Subject: Re: KRA_gak
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19961213125042.00690070@pop.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <199612131510.KAA27361@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
John Young wrote:
| The key recovery alliance has more than tripled its membership
| and identified its charter objectives.
| + promoting interoperability between different key recovery and
| non-key recovery solutions
Isn't this in direct conflict with one of NIST's criteria?
| + defining a commercial infrastructure for worldwide development
| of strong encryption
|
| + maximizing security for business
Isn't this in direct conflict with the FBI's criteria? ;)
| To facilitate meeting these and other objectives, the alliance
| identified a series of working committees targeted to meet within
| the next 60 days. Soon after this 60-day period, the now
| 40-member alliance will re-convene to mark the progress of these
| committees and to identify future benchmarks and deliverables.
Did they identify the committees, or announce that they will
exist?
Adam
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume
Return to December 1996
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”