1996-12-11 - Apropros of labeling systems…

Header Data

From: Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d4ee496ceb895b89a594b83c97fb88cc8ed6896c288c07ef3f1852d3da65e5e7
Message ID: <32AE0DE0.6BBC@tivoli.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-11 01:27:39 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:27:39 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:27:39 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Apropros of labeling systems...
Message-ID: <32AE0DE0.6BBC@tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Yahoo has a Reuter's story covering a policy statement from the American
Academy of Pediatrics.  They're concerned about record content 
description labels; they don't think their "strong" enough.

	If the industry does not develop a stronger voluntary
	system, it said, Congress should impose one.

(I wonder if they really said that Congress should impose a 
stronger voluntary system?)

I wonder when people will realize that the threat of Congress imposing
a ratings system seems functionally equivalent to Congress imposing a
ratings system?

-- 
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Mike McNally -- Egregiously Pointy -- Tivoli Systems, "IBM" -- Austin
mailto:m5@tivoli.com    mailto:m101@io.com    http://www.io.com/~m101
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^





Thread