1996-12-14 - Re: !! Point ‘n Crypt – Win95 Privacy for Everyone !!

Header Data

From: ghio@myriad.alias.net (Matthew Ghio)
To: walt@blarg.net
Message Hash: e671a41d1accb832f1e3fb4eddcf43502f0672fcbce0f6bc88d25e2e4ae39dfc
Message ID: <199612140049.TAA24734@myriad>
Reply To: <01BBE7FB.2D4DC6A0@dialup13.blarg.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-14 00:55:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:55:02 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ghio@myriad.alias.net (Matthew Ghio)
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:55:02 -0800 (PST)
To: walt@blarg.net
Subject: Re: !! Point 'n Crypt -- Win95 Privacy for Everyone !!
In-Reply-To: <01BBE7FB.2D4DC6A0@dialup13.blarg.net>
Message-ID: <199612140049.TAA24734@myriad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


walt@blarg.net (Walt Armour) wrote:
> Point 'n Crypt uses 40-bit DES-CBC (exportable), salted SHA passphrases,
> and conforms to PKCS #5 and PKCS #7.

40bit encryption isn't much security at all.  If you've got something
important enough to encrypt, then it's important enough to find a proper
encryption program.  Why would anyone buy this shit?

(That's a rhetorical question, of course; the answer is because some
people are stupid...)





Thread