From: "captain.sarcastic" <kkoller@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 08:22:55 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: no subject (file transmission)
Message-ID: <199612041622.LAA28641@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From cypherpunks-errors@toad.com  Wed Dec  4 11:22:29 1996
Received: from RES2.RESNET.UPENN.EDU (root@RES2.RESNET.UPENN.EDU [130.91.195.242]) by mail1.panix.com (8.7.5/8.7.1/PanixM1.0+) with ESMTP id LAA14598 for <kkoller@panix.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:22:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from poboxer.pobox.com (poboxer.pobox.com [207.8.188.2]) by RES2.RESNET.UPENN.EDU (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA13349 for <kkoller@RES2.RESNET.UPENN.EDU>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:23:19 -0500
Received: from toad.com (toad.com [140.174.2.1]) by poboxer.pobox.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA24598 for <kkoller@sarcasm.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 11:21:08 -0500
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA12176 for cypherpunks-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 04:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uu.psi.com (uu.psi.com [136.161.128.3]) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA12170 for <cypherpunks@toad.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 04:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uu.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.061193-PSI/PSINet) via UUCP;
        id AA25881 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 96 07:26:15 -0500
Received: by bwalk.dm.com (1.65/waf)
	via UUCP; Wed, 04 Dec 96 06:51:51 EST
	for cypherpunks@toad.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anyone considered adding crypto into Microsoft Outlook?
From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Comments: All power to the ZOG!
Message-Id: <9PueyD62w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 96 06:50:07 EST
In-Reply-To: <01BBE14A.04580F10@crecy.ai.mit.edu>
Organization: Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Precedence: bulk

"Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu> writes:
> 	It just struck me that it would probably make the most convenient =
> platform for integrating cryptography. After all MAPI is an open, =
> extensible API allowing ready access to the email "hooks" necessary. The =
> integration of an address book with the email system makes it very easy =
> to add public key information into a person's entry.

Yes, this would be feasible. Problem is, "cypher punks" don't write code.
They only write flames and postmaster complaints.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps