1996-12-13 - Re: Credentials without Identity–Race Bits

Header Data

From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: fd5668f549386874177e5df4887de69c96f706bf5b55591705c569f9ff6b7a78
Message ID: <199612130530.AAA01548@goffette.research.megasoft.com>
Reply To: <v03007804aed4c9238269@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-13 05:37:37 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 21:37:37 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 21:37:37 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Credentials without Identity--Race Bits
In-Reply-To: <v03007804aed4c9238269@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <199612130530.AAA01548@goffette.research.megasoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>>>>> "Tim" == Timothy C May <tcmay@got.net> writes:

Tim> While it has been claimed by some that "crypto anarchy" means
Tim> that race won't matter, that cyberspace interactions will be
Tim> color-blind, this is misleading.

Race bits, gender bits, etc., are all interesting possibilities. I
never thought about anyone wanting to do such a thing, but I suppose
that's likely.

I've tended to think that as we become increasingly digital, issues
like race become less significant (perhaps because it generally isn't
immediately obvious in this medium). This doesn't mean that prejudices
go away, it means that they shift to stay with what is obvious. For
example, people who are unable to spell well (and don't spellcheck
email and usenet posts), or use excessively poor grammar are often
ridiculed for their lack of mastery of the language in which they're
writing. Basically, the prejudices and such continue with us, but
change, so as to remain based on things that are easily discernible.

Tim> While many--probably most--users will care only for cyberspace
Tim> personna issues, and not meatspace personna issues of race,
Tim> color, height, weight, etc., this is not something built in to
Tim> anonymous transactions.

As I'm replying, it's occurred to me that we've already got some sort
of persona "certificates" floating around now. (Such as the Geek
Code.) Imagine a field there to include race. Wouldn't take a lot to
do that, after all.

Of course, the implementation of a race bit system that can be trusted
is another issue altogether. Would the White Boyz Club then need to
have its own trusted arbitrator to introduce people of the same race
to each other? (AryanSign?) Is a more elaborate PGP-style web
of trust used? Hmm.

-- 
Matt Curtin  cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com  Megasoft, Inc   Chief Scientist
http://www.research.megasoft.com/people/cmcurtin/   I speak only for myself.
Hacker Security Firewall Crypto PGP Privacy Unix Perl Java Internet Intranet





Thread