1997-01-05 - Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN….. (fwd)

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Message Hash: 061f2d2c0d0611a448c8340fb55521d2fe187b6d71dbb0001b8e2f2a0a669702
Message ID: <32CF1A27.57A0@gte.net>
Reply To: <199701041932.NAA32121@einstein>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-05 03:11:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 19:11:18 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 19:11:18 -0800 (PST)
To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN..... (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199701041932.NAA32121@einstein>
Message-ID: <32CF1A27.57A0@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jim Choate wrote:
> Forwarded message:
> > Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 10:24:21 -0800
> > From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
> > C'mon Gary, why would anyone want to bother with all of this crap?
> > Chip implants are already in millions of pets.  It's simple, cheap,
> > and there's no work for the owner.

> > Thousands of humans are also implanted, i.e., Green Berets, Seals, and
> > similar types, women with breast implants, and so on.  There's a move-
> > ment on to implant most children, so they're not as vulnerable to kid-
> > napping, etc.

> Baloney. I know two SEAL's (I share an office at work with one) and I
> can verify they are NOT chiped. I also have several female friends who have
> had various breast surgeries and they also are not chipped.

Well, I guess the baloney clause wins, 'cause I certainly can't verify
it.  OTOH, if an intelligence officer (i.e., Navy Seal) tells me the
sky is green and the grass is blue, I'll understand completely (wink).

The breast implant thing is supposed to be law, although again, I don't
have my hand in anyone's bra to check them out....






Thread