From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 08003746b37a394cf302b3a291750fcdc0ec66ef97599bdb330eb8ae0e720449
Message ID: <32E17314.3640@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <199701181645.SAA17382@vesuri.Helsinki.FI>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-19 00:25:50 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 16:25:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 16:25:50 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Cheap CyberShots
In-Reply-To: <199701181645.SAA17382@vesuri.Helsinki.FI>
Message-ID: <32E17314.3640@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In the interests of upgrading the quality of cheap shots in
CyberSpace, I thought I would pass along the following as an
example of how to 'finesse' a cheap shot.
> Shouting Ground Technologies, Inc. is concerned about the increased
> abuse of the internet with "spamming". In this instance, we find
> ourselves in a dilemma.
> * We do not condone any improper use of the internet, including
> spamming.
> * We respect the right of privacy of individuals, and the right
> to conduct lawful business unhindered.
...
> In the past few days we've received a lot of complaints about the
> inappropriate messages. Several people have demanded that we take
> immediate action. A couple were very critical that we did not
> cut their internet access immediately.
...
> So people are in effect suggesting that we
> * Unilaterally violate the terms of their service contract, subjecting
> us to liability for their lost business.
> * Violate their right to privacy by filtering and reading all of
> their e-mail and news traffic.
> Presumably we would have the same culpability for all of our clients,
> so we'd have to read everybody's e-mail before passing it on. We
> suspect that anybody that wants to be treated that way already
> has service with Prodigy.
Return to January 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”
Unknown thread root