From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0fec58430ea60cb666d8b10153a6ba349a530be9c3840ca72e5d54c942ab92c8
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19970106134505.00668844@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-06 13:49:45 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 05:49:45 -0800 (PST)
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 05:49:45 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: High-tech tracking by police raises legal outcry
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970106134505.00668844@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On prohibitions against surveillance countermeasures:
Here's a provocative distinction in "compromising
emanations" (TEMPEST) from the Commerce Control
List of the EAR:
"List of Items Controlled
5A002.d Equipment designed or modified to suppress
the compromising emanations of information-bearing
signals;
Note: 5A002.d does not control equipment specially
designed to suppress emanations for reasons of health
and safety."
Wonder how much dangerous EMR the regs allow to keep
the snoops happy. Reminds me of the brain-cancer-crypto
NSA imposed on cellular phone intentional radiators.
Return to January 1997
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1997-01-06 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 05:49:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: High-tech tracking by police raises legal outcry - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>