From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 12815ea0be02ae6a33716461dd59ac2627988bbaee3e297b89fdf0d8ac431301
Message ID: <199701260710.XAA10352@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-26 07:10:31 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 23:10:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 23:10:31 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Corelation
Message-ID: <199701260710.XAA10352@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
My database seems to indicate a direct co-relation between the
number of postings criticizing moderation and the number of
UCE/Spam postings showing up on the list.
i.e. When there are a number of postings critizizing Sandy's
moderation, then the diversionary UCE/Spam postings increase
dramatically.
Has anyone actually 'seen' John Gilmore, lately? Since there
have been a number of postings indicating that the writer
'used to respect' Gilmore, I am wondering if perhaps this
moderation experiment is not actually an attempt by someone
to discredit him.
Perhaps he is being held hostage somewhere, while the more
nefarious elements among us are trying to besmirch his good
name by using it to promote willy-nilly censorship and
class-elitism.
Toto
Return to January 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”
1997-01-26 (Sat, 25 Jan 1997 23:10:31 -0800 (PST)) - Corelation - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>