From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 19f9cc2dc3f2af45fc29e34b316c452e026fecc3777b60801fdac4631f1bea12
Message ID: <199701201611.IAA12321@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-20 16:11:37 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 08:11:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 08:11:37 -0800 (PST)
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Sandy and the Doc
Message-ID: <199701201611.IAA12321@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Bill Frantz wrote:
> I hope if such a system is set up, people who use it will realize that
> email is not 100% reliable. Just because algebra.com sent mail to
> toad.com, doesn't mean that toad.com actually received it. A small
> fraction of a percent of these messages will be lost.
Are there any critereon established, yet, as to what type of content
will be necessary for a letter to get 'lost'?
Return to January 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”
1997-01-20 (Mon, 20 Jan 1997 08:11:37 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sandy and the Doc - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>