From: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 24a89e3f8de8f81a7a03fdacb2215b669053bdf9a20d054c5ac912ac3ffa5f75
Message ID: <199701212033.MAA29427@netcom17.netcom.com>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19970120210810.006dd5cc@192.100.81.126>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-21 20:33:49 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 12:33:49 -0800 (PST)
From: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 12:33:49 -0800 (PST)
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Netscape to use Cybercash?
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970120210810.006dd5cc@192.100.81.126>
Message-ID: <199701212033.MAA29427@netcom17.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
(S.Schear tells me that he thinks the lack of anonymity in
payment schemes is what is primarily what is holding them
back, not good GUI interfaces. I consider this hogwash,
but maybe we can agree to disagree.)
Lucky Green writes:
>Netscape has announce that Navigator will ship with CyberCash.
>There is definitely movement at the browser/server end.
whoa, I missed this. was there any discussion on this list? or
is it just because we are drowning in noise? any more specifics?
I personally am hoping for a point-and-click interface with
the piggybank/cost HTML tag scenario I described. also, any ETA?
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>”