From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2813259b57009ad88e2bb2411f93cbae4a8b675323af684dc6999ce5c4234508
Message ID: <199701192255.OAA05514@netcom23.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199701191919.NAA00377@einstein>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-19 22:55:22 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 14:55:22 -0800 (PST)
From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 14:55:22 -0800 (PST)
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: I beg you, PLEASE prove that 0.123456789101112131415 is IRRATIONAL (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199701191919.NAA00377@einstein>
Message-ID: <199701192255.OAA05514@netcom23.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jim Choate writes:
> "If every segment is to have a numerical measure as its length, then a new
> domain of numbers is needed, an extension to the domain of rational numbers.
> This new domain can no longer be constructed, as in the previous case, by
> number pairs. But hints for its construction are provided by a theoretical
> analysis of the measuring process for segments."
> A mathematicaly rigorous defintion of the class of numbers called 'Real'
> is that which equates the members of that set to the possible lengths of an
> arbitrary line segment.
This seems a tad circular, as the real number line, from which line
segments are constructed, is a copy of the set of real numbers.
One can construct the reals from the rationals quite easily using any
of several well-known methods, such as equivalence classes of Cauchy
sequences, or Dedikind cuts.
--
Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $
mpd@netcom.com $ via Finger. $
Return to January 1997
Return to “mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)”