1997-01-02 - Re: premail.
Header Data
From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2be2a678edd6e3be3254bbf2fdb22c9030e41ab8d65addf4b6888ca244361974
Message ID: <32CB2EEC.6596@disposable.com>
Reply To: <199612310718.BAA02863@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-02 03:40:57 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 19:40:57 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 19:40:57 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: premail.
In-Reply-To: <199612310718.BAA02863@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <32CB2EEC.6596@disposable.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Big Moma wrote:
>
> ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) wrote:[...]
> > Maybe remailer operators should asks someone reputable to sign their
> > remailers' keys so that the users can easily verify the signatures.
>
> Yes, that is one part of it. Another part is that Raph should
> include a public PGP key in the premail program and then sign both the
> remailer-list and the pubring at kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu with it.
Those resources are automatically generated by programs running on a
machine of unverified security on the Internet. A PGP signature doesn't
mean much in such a situation.
-rich
Thread
- Return to December 1996
Return to January 1997
- Return to “Big Moma <moma@nym.alias.net>”
- Return to “ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)”
- Return to “Liz Taylor <liz@nym.alias.net>”
Return to “Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>”
- 1996-12-31 (Mon, 30 Dec 1996 23:22:40 -0800 (PST)) - Re: premail. - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
- 1996-12-31 (Tue, 31 Dec 1996 10:49:19 -0800 (PST)) - Re: premail. - Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
- 1996-12-31 (Tue, 31 Dec 1996 12:50:05 -0800 (PST)) - Re: premail. - Big Moma <moma@nym.alias.net>
- 1997-01-02 (Wed, 1 Jan 1997 19:40:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: premail. - Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
- 1997-01-02 (Thu, 2 Jan 1997 01:26:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: premail. - Liz Taylor <liz@nym.alias.net>