1997-01-02 - Re: premail.

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2be2a678edd6e3be3254bbf2fdb22c9030e41ab8d65addf4b6888ca244361974
Message ID: <32CB2EEC.6596@disposable.com>
Reply To: <199612310718.BAA02863@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-02 03:40:57 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 19:40:57 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 19:40:57 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: premail.
In-Reply-To: <199612310718.BAA02863@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <32CB2EEC.6596@disposable.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Big Moma wrote:
> ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) wrote:[...]
> > Maybe remailer operators should asks someone reputable to sign their
> > remailers' keys so that the users can easily verify the signatures.
>         Yes, that is one part of it. Another part is that Raph should
> include a public PGP key in the premail program and then sign both the
> remailer-list and the pubring at kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu with it.

Those resources are automatically generated by programs running on a 
machine of unverified security on the Internet. A PGP signature doesn't 
mean much in such a situation.