From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 10:20:30 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: decryption
In-Reply-To: <199701121133.NAA10607@liasec.sec.lia.net>
Message-ID: <32D93FD1.1064@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Pierre van Rooyen wrote:
> 
> Will you please try to decrypt the following, I want to make sure it is not
> decryptable.
> - The first paragraph decrypted reads:
> 
> There are plenty of programs you could buy such as
> Floodgate to pull your own addresses however, these
> programs (even when used properly) can take up to 6 months
> just to pull as many as 750,000 addresses!  And after
> THAT time has elapsed you're database will have plenty
> of addresses that are undeliverable.

  Now, the list is receiving encrypted CipherSpam.  I'm getting 
brainlock, here.
  Is this development:
  1. Good? (CypherPunks is forcing even Spammers to use crypto?)
  2. Bad? (Spammers think CypherPunks are so dumb they will 'work'
           for their spam?)
  3. Ambivalent? (It doesn't really matter, because my brain has
                  turned to spam?)

Toto