From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 45ffc4dcceb6ba5817d78850060e3123010b89c256b9bc78ad57942a3906cf72
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970107220244.291A-100000@eclipse.voicenet.com>
Reply To: <199701070452.UAA23628@netcom11.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-08 03:05:23 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 19:05:23 -0800 (PST)
From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 19:05:23 -0800 (PST)
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Germany Passes Sweeping Cyberspace Legislation 01/06/97 (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199701070452.UAA23628@netcom11.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970107220244.291A-100000@eclipse.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 6 Jan 1997 wb8foz@netcom.com wrote:
> The law also prohibits the use of "cookies," software applets that
> trace a user's path across the Internet and recording the data they
> view.
>
> This is, to me!
I haven't had time to search for any more information on the law, but if this
law bans _all_ cookies, then this is just another example of the technological
cluelessness that exists in various governments. I don't agree with any
restrictions on cookies, but if there are going to be any, then the least they
could do is allow cookies if the HTML page indicates somewhere on it that it
is sending a cookie. This would prevent companies like "Doubleclick" from
gathering information, but would permit "legitimate" uses.
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBMtMP0SzIPc7jvyFpAQF3wAf/XzJZ3RYJj0kuci1bTJwMoXvAw/OJEoMD
ncYsvr58t/kPIFsbBs+bgCSgiFXDHACOZLqlCeRFjgkOF+ljY0Syqw2g4iNoczo/
LQ17NYplMQv4u0sxrCQxvPK0xNddO5zdy9fmSTJecMtGXIaZ6iTqiX0smNAD0nED
a/clBz6zbI+DUBXVyaX7Gmn7nOQJ3ySTAycWGRoU5CkcSsbI3TjHTMiqyEw/oRst
Xio8q9GS0/+K4BtZGP8Evn7meHEjv4yL1gucLREtgqgLLj1AQUn3jKHzORGFQ2Fx
6mrTSnRBjLzE3xcBr/r0YxHIEnqy78xz10UuMIGas7DEfFNyfHGejw==
=tCA6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1997
Return to “wb8foz@netcom.com”