From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Message Hash: 47b8b21dd1457f2e4514a4fb195b1ebfb8b95607be5c78ab7191df1d5f623299
Message ID: <199701200610.WAA01640@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-20 06:10:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 22:10:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 22:10:45 -0800 (PST)
To: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: Dedikend Cut's and such
Message-ID: <199701200610.WAA01640@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jim Choate allegedly said:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Did a little research, Dedekind Cut's and such use Integers to define a
> SPECIFIC Real to a arbitrary BUT FIXED resolution. They do not define the
> set of Reals.
They do. The set of all numbers representable by a DC is precisely
the set of reals.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: 5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E 87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F
Return to January 1997
Return to “Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>”
1997-01-20 (Sun, 19 Jan 1997 22:10:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dedikend Cut’s and such - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>