From: OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>
To: blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
Message Hash: 49e87b5c45997030471f6b39b4cdd562b906f03b41baa6e1bd2a34e535cdbd94
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.970129001058.16757C-100000@pegasus.montclair.edu>
Reply To: <01BC0D5D.D7CD3200@king2-20.cnw.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-29 05:20:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 21:20:04 -0800 (PST)
From: OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 21:20:04 -0800 (PST)
To: blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
Subject: RE: Fighting the cybercensor
In-Reply-To: <01BC0D5D.D7CD3200@king2-20.cnw.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.970129001058.16757C-100000@pegasus.montclair.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 28 Jan 1997, blanc wrote:
> From: jim bell
>
> [ on discussing AP on the cpunk list]:
>
> Because it's on-topic, that's why. Because it's not merely a list
> concerning METHODS of encryption, it's also about the _reasons_ for using
> encryption, as well as the _effects_ (both small-scale and large-scale) of
> using encryption.
> --
>
[...]
> I was thinking the reason that most people don't think of applying AP is
> because they're normal. It is not the first thought of a normal person to
> kill another human, just because they've been offended - even severely. It
> takes an extraordinary circumstance to motivate one to such destruction,
> especially if there are a thousand armed troops supporting the object of
> the attempt.
>
Any normal person has potential to kill,
why they don't...? They have other thoughts
and dreams for a better future.
oksas
Return to January 1997
Return to “OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>”