1997-01-21 - Re: GSM crypto upgrade? (was Re: Newt’s phone calls)

Header Data

From: Liz Taylor <liz@nym.alias.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4eddb48c1da4872c71fd75fc1e729311ac6019461555eed70730ead971c38e53
Message ID: <19970121045809.17075.qmail@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199701202142.NAA19098@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-21 04:58:19 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 20:58:19 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Liz Taylor <liz@nym.alias.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 20:58:19 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: GSM crypto upgrade? (was Re: Newt's phone calls)
In-Reply-To: <199701202142.NAA19098@toad.com>
Message-ID: <19970121045809.17075.qmail@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz) wrote:
> The box has a 3 or 4 digit display which displays "something" about the
> 3DES key, where "something" is some of the bits, or a hash, or ...  With 3
> decimal digits, a MIM attacker has a 999 out of 1000 chance of getting
> caught.

Not true. It will take a MIM machine less than a tenth of a second to
come up with a 3DES key that will have the same three digit hash.
Remember the attack found about Clipper's LEAF hash, which was only
16 bits long?





Thread