From: “Tobin Fricke” <tobin@mail.edm.net>
To: “Phil Karn” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 5517c60911a83253453c243b7f00c0fdad8eefbff0a20f2fdde793b24922dff0
Message ID: <199701290612.WAA04048@ns2.snni.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-29 06:59:22 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 22:59:22 -0800 (PST)
From: "Tobin Fricke" <tobin@mail.edm.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 22:59:22 -0800 (PST)
To: "Phil Karn" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Machine readable form (was:RE: [DES] DES Key Recovery Project, Progress Report #7)
Message-ID: <199701290612.WAA04048@ns2.snni.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> This seems clear enough. If it's printed on paper, it's kosher for
> export. But if we're really overt about it, we may goad the government
> into attempting to control printed source code as well. That could
> prove most interesting.
Hmmm.. Printing out, say, PGP as a book where each page is a 2 dimensional
bar code would be rather interesting. Then again, OCR works pretty well
for normal text.
A printed book or other printed material setting forth
encryption
source code is not itself subject to the EAR (see
Sec. 734.3(b)(2)). However, notwithstanding Sec. 734.3(b)(2),
encryption source code in electronic form or media (e.g., computer
diskette or CD ROM) remains subject to the EAR (see
Sec. 734.3(b)(3)).
Does a barcode fall under "electronic form or media" or is it "printed
material"? What about punched cards? (-:
Tobin Fricke
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Tobin Fricke” <tobin@mail.edm.net>”
1997-01-29 (Tue, 28 Jan 1997 22:59:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Machine readable form (was:RE: [DES] DES Key Recovery Project, Progress Report #7) - “Tobin Fricke” <tobin@mail.edm.net>