From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Message Hash: 59dfe2bfc5264d3882e63b08f80745636dd9eaf2d0518966ed7e16107c0fc6dc
Message ID: <32F1BC58.4A8C@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <199701301237.MAA26312@mailhub.amaranth.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-31 07:30:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 23:30:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 23:30:45 -0800 (PST)
To: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Subject: Re: Workaround for filtering/cybersitter
In-Reply-To: <199701301237.MAA26312@mailhub.amaranth.com>
Message-ID: <32F1BC58.4A8C@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
William H. Geiger III wrote:
> Whenever I did decide to prosecute someone I would make it a big public show
> for everyone to see with very stiff penalties.
Like unsubscribing Dr. Vulis.
> After several of these trails the "sheep
> factor" will keep 99% of the population in line (US Crypto policy is a prime example).
The cypherpunks-censored list is another example.
> The point I am trying to make is that for the censor his set-up does not need to be that
> sophisticated as fear and intimidation will keep 99% of the
> rank-and-file in line. As for the other 1%, well they already know who they are and new
> laws will only help take care of that "problem".
No one seems to be calling Sandy's moderation overly sophisticated.
Toto
Return to January 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”