From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: DataETRsch@aol.com
Message Hash: 6e91a007d166878204ac23d0e5a52362cdd22a81211e2bf6318a7c754242a08e
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970109022616.10573J-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <970108211056_1622671474@emout11.mail.aol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-09 07:31:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 23:31:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 23:31:16 -0800 (PST)
To: DataETRsch@aol.com
Subject: Re: New Release: Universal Data Cryptography Module V2.0
In-Reply-To: <970108211056_1622671474@emout11.mail.aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970109022616.10573J-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 8 Jan 1997 DataETRsch@aol.com wrote:
> Integrated Mathematical Data Manipulation and Positioning. Extensive research
> shows that IMDMP is more advanced than DES, RSA, IDEA, and PGP.
What research?
What is "extensive?"
What is "more advanced?"
>
> UDCM (the IMDMP algorithm)...
> o Is more advanced than all of the industry standard encryption algorithms.
By who's standard?
> o Allows encryption keys as large as 256 bytes (2048 bits).
As if these directly correlate.
> o Includes 18 sub-algorithms.
The purpose of which is...?
> o Allows multiple encryption layer levels.
What encryption doesn't?
> o Has absolutely no back-doors or magical keys.
Says who?
> o Processes files as large as 2,147,483,390 bytes.
Why is there a limit?
--
Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures
Finger for Public Key Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern
Vote Monarchist Switzerland
Return to January 1997
Return to “roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)”