1997-01-21 - Re: You can now subscr. to the moderated/unmoderated/flames lists

Header Data

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Message Hash: 715a27a5463ef9a0c7f2804364292b43343eae2af5c95093a783d1be6edb87d1
Message ID: <32E4905C.4045@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <199701140637.WAA14213@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-21 08:20:34 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:20:34 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:20:34 -0800 (PST)
To: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Subject: Re: You can now subscr. to the moderated/unmoderated/flames lists
In-Reply-To: <199701140637.WAA14213@toad.com>
Message-ID: <32E4905C.4045@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Dale Thorn wrote:

> I don't like to admit to it, but I've practiced baiting for many years

  This startling announcement ranks right up there at the top of the
'surprise' scale, along with K.D. Lang's announcement that she is gay.
(Like the Butch (crew-cut) hairstyle was not a major hint.)

  By the way, when I espoused my opinion that the moderation
announcement's
"your suggestions will be considered" was merely political rhetoric, I 
was offered (and took) a bet of 50,000 electronic porno byte-credits
on whether or not I was right.
  My opponent and I agreed that lack of any serious recognition of the
list
member's input would be taken as a sign of my supposition being correct.
I am of the belief that I have won the bet. Does anyone have any proof
to the contrary?

Toto







Thread